Gospel Gazette Online
Volume 24 Number 6 June 2022
Page 10

Should I Change Churches?

T. Pierce Brown

T. Pierce BrownIf most of us who consider ourselves sound, conservative Gospel preachers were asked the question, “Do you think I need to change churches?” by a member of some denomination with whom we were studying, probably at least 99% of us would answer with a resounding, “Yes!” The primary problem with that is that about 99% of the time, we would not be answering the question he thinks he has asked. In his own mind, he has asked, “Do you mean to tell me that I need to leave my denomination and join yours or some other one?” Deeper in his mind is this thought, “You think that the Church of Christ church is better than any other denomination.” If you merely answer his question, “Yes,” as a large number of persons who claim membership in the Lord’s church would, you have confirmed his opinion. If you found a person living on the street in a pasteboard box or under an overpass, if you wanted him to come into the house where food and warmth were found, would you say to him, “You should change houses?” The very idea that a pasteboard box is in the same category as a house is erroneous. Any time we use language that suggests that any manmade institution is in the same category as the Lord’s church, we do damage to the Gospel truth.

The more nearly correct, although partial, answer would be, “Merely changing churches would not do you any good.” Surely, anyone who has done any personal evangelism knows that the normal concept of the religious world is that we teach that joining the Church of Christ church is what saves a person. Do you not see that the expression, “You need to change churches” means to most persons that the organization they are in is about the same as the organization they are being asked to join (even if we say “come into”), but we think ours is a little better? It is our strong opinion that thousands who are more or less loosely connected with the Lord’s church, some of whom are elders, deacons or preachers, think of the church as “a glorious, blood-bought institution or organization into which a person must come in order to get salvation.” Accurately speaking, the church is not an organization, although it should be organized in order to function as God ordained. If I come into your community in which there is no church, and I baptize three persons into Christ, the church is now there, but no organization is there.

I know that I may risk the wrath of some brethren when I write anything contrary to the notion that the Bible emphasis is that a person chose to come into the church in order to be saved. However, for those of us who speak so highly of calling Bible things by Bible names and doing Bible things in Bible ways, it is amazing that more of us do not realize that in New Testament times, no apostle ever preached to an alien sinner anything about a blood-bought institution into which he must come in order to get salvation. Did Jesus die to save an organization or institution, or did He die to save individuals who were then classified as a part of the body of Christ, the church?

Surely it does not take an especially astute person to see the difference in the concept of the church as a sort of glorified country club in which one should seek membership if he wants to be saved, and the concept of rendering obedience to Christ at which time he is saved and placed in God’s record among the other called out ones. Is anyone so naive as to think that when Peter preached on Pentecost any one of the 3,000 who obeyed the Gospel had any concept at all of trying to do whatever it took to get membership in the church?

There is almost as much difference in the two concepts as there is in night and day. It is our conviction that much of the lethargy we see in the church of today is because most of the members think getting membership in the church saved them. They think they got membership in the church by getting baptized. So, they assume that they “got saved” merely by being baptized. Of course, no Gospel preacher ever preached it that way, but many that claim membership in the Lord’s church seem to think that getting membership in the church is what saved them. Whether they submitted to Christ as Lord was not at the center of their consciousness. They are told that they have “completed their obedience” and are now part of the family of God. What more could a person want?

This is probably why the idea of “total commitment” so strongly promulgated by the Crossroads philosophy gained so much prominence. They saw that the thousands who would so strongly say, “I am a Church of Christ” had no real commitment to Christ. So, they tried to arrange a program that would change that. In the process they made more problems than they solved. Yet, the sad truth is that we are still plagued with the concept that getting membership in the church (however that may be done) is the really important thing. This is why so many say, “Christ, yes, but the church, no.” They do not understand that when one is properly baptized into Christ he is in the church, but simply “changing churches” will not put him there. So, we may teach people that if they change churches, it will solve their problem and gain salvation for them. When a person by language or action puts the Lord’s church, which consists of all the saved persons in the world, in the same category as any human institution, he does a great disservice to the cause of Christ. Even if he thinks of it as a divine institution, into which a person must come in order to get saved, he has perverted the Bible emphasis. I did not “come into the church” in order to get saved, as if there were two steps in the process: First, coming into the church, then the result of that was salvation. Nor was I saved in order to be fit to join some church. I was saved and added to the church at the same time, and our language about the value of “changing churches” may hide that truth, for it usually leaves a person with a denominational concept of the church.

[Editor’s Note: Sadly, there is a pressing need to convert the church to Christ! ~ Louis Rushmore, Editor]

Abandonment Is Real

Aaron Cozort

Aaron CozortAbandonment is real for an unimaginable number of people in the world today. They have been forsaken by those who were supposed to protect them. Their days are fraught with danger and temptation, and their protection is virtually non-existent. The Psalmist writer penned, “When my father and my mother forsake me, Then the LORD will take care of me” (Psalm 27:10 NKJV).

Many people in this world have found themselves alone, forsaken and abandoned. Their own parents will not come to their rescue. Their families have no care or concern for their wellbeing. These people need to learn what the Psalmist writer learned – that God never forsakes you. Psalm 27:14 provides consolation when it says, “Wait on the LORD; Be of good courage, And He shall strengthen your heart; Wait, I say, on the LORD!”

I’ll Never Abandon the Lord

Joshua 24:16 represents a praiseworthy disposition toward God. “So the people answered and said: ‘Far be it from us that we should forsake the LORD to serve other gods.’” However, the commitment of one generation is often followed by the downfall of another as humanity’s relationship with God ebbs and flows. The Israelites of Joshua’s day were filled with conviction that they would never depart from God, and they would never be willing to forsake the Lord. Yet, in reality, it was just a short time before they turned away from the Lord and turned to idols. Even in the first century church, the reality is that Christians abandoned God just like Israel had abandoned God. The apostle Paul noted this human failing. “Let no one deceive you by any means; for that Day will not come unless the falling away comes first, and the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition” (2 Thessalonians 2:3).

Return to the Lord

Isaiah 31:6-7 reads, “Return to Him against whom the children of Israel have deeply revolted. For in that day every man shall throw away his idols of silver and his idols of gold – sin, which your own hands have made for yourselves.” God wants those who have abandoned Him to return, to come back and to renew their relationship with Him once again. He has not forgotten nor forsaken them if they would just be willing to repent and to return. Notice Isaiah 55:7, which says, “Let the wicked forsake his way, And the unrighteous man his thoughts; Let him return to the LORD, And He will have mercy on him; And to our God, For He will abundantly pardon.”

Abandonment Rewarded

Our Lord Jesus Christ gave this assurance. “And everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or wife or children or lands, for My name’s sake, shall receive a hundredfold, and inherit eternal life. But many who are first will be last, and the last first” (Matthew 19:29-30). Jesus wants us to clearly understand the importance of spiritual matters over physical concerns. It is with this importance that God makes sure that Christians know they cannot ever abandon anything for God’s sake and Him be unaware of their sacrifice. While God clearly excepts us to keep our obligations, responsibilities and vows, if any person or thing in our lives comes between us and God, we need to remove such hindrances. We need to abandon anything except God if Heaven is to be our eternal abode.

[Editor’s Note: Though abandoned in this world, we must never abandon God, Who will never abandon us. ~ Louis Rushmore, Editor]

In This Issue: Go to Page 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16
Copyright 1999-2023                                                                 Conditions of Use

Click Here for a FREE monthly reminder when each new issue
of Gospel Gazette Online has been published to the Internet.

Click Here to send the URL for this page to a friend

Click Here to send your comments about this page to Gospel Gazette Online